@Adunato said in #13:
> I think with the advent of AI this will be a common trend for a while, where some people will challenge "how" online content was generated rather than the quality or usefulness of the content itself. Personally as long as the quality is good and the "tone" is nice to read I don't mind.
>
> In this case I didn't see any Chat GPT "footprint" and it all sounded very relatable and extremely useful. With all that being said, thanks so much for this post, it really inspired me to start some visualisation training, you made it sound less daunting and rather exciting.
Thanks, I really enjoyed creating that visualisation course, and for me - I was shocked how on recording what I said, how there were inaccuracies especially when I forced myself to use long notation - saying where the start squares are. So basically even fun mate puzzles can be used for visualisation training - given the solution until the final mate. I thought this whole training regime was "light" and fun compared to what some GMs seem to be doing. I did also try the method of recall of a master game - say 3 moves at a time but this wasn't as much fun in my view. I don't think I will be doing blindfold simultaneous displays any time soon though like Alekhine :)
