lichess.org
Donate

Kingscrusher should be banned

Hi all

I think it is weird he has an anti KIA line now about 12 times against me in bullet or hyperbullet which he couldnt identify. I can try and get the accuracy checks for those but lets just take the 30 second games from earlier:

Here are some of my encounters against Amadan in the hyperbullet earlier:

http://en.lichess.org/lOQvUru2/black 19 average centipawn loss

http://en.lichess.org/GoRgErkE/black 25 cpl

http://en.lichess.org/zeEdZv6v/black#77 17 cpl

4.http://en.lichess.org/tjy0OaK3/white 24 cpl

5.http://en.lichess.org/IUKRL2vx/black 17 cpl

6.http://en.lichess.org/ixrJ0Gsc/white 20 cpl

Is it normal for non Gms to have this accuracy for 30 second games?!
Nice KC, I see you have taken a bit longer then I thought you would to scan through the hundreds of Games Amadan played, Congrats.
Please reply to my arguement on forum post 37.
Fins thought IMadirtycheater was cheating for quite some time, but he only voiced those suspicions after the player got caught. You could learn from that KC, it's a shame that lesson might very well prevent you from playing on this site.
Ppl plz stop posting so fast i cant keep up :P. Also amadan, i care if you leave the site! <3
The move times in the games combined by the fact that it's imperfect and very human play doesn't add up to a very convincing accusation.
@Kingcrusher-YouTube If you look at the evaluation in the games you linked, they all had large portions of >9.9 pawn advantage. When a move is made, regardless of how good the move is, as long as it retains the >9.9 pawn advantage, then the computer reads it as a 0 average centipawn loss move.
There is obviously a mutual antipathy between the two adversaries but it's interesting to see how their supporters weigh in. Storms in teacups indeed ! Tomorrow is another day :D

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.