Come on Iran!

@Yehonatan-Chess said in #18:
> Hamas is a terrorists organization. Nothing you say will change that.
May I change your opinion?
Hamas doesn't count in definition of organization, so It can't be a "terrorists organization". I prefer to not to speak any opinions here about it being terrorist or not; as the best way It only causes to an internet fight which will show up inside The House's Memes channel.
>
> What do you mean lol, like 99% of Hamas' attacks are backed by Iran. Stop making stuff up.
you know; everybody has his own version of truth; It can be pretty hard to change others' truths.

@RetiredProffesor said in #22:
> May I change your opinion?
> Hamas doesn't count in definition of organization, so It can't be a "terrorists organization". I prefer to not to speak any opinions here about it being terrorist or not; as the best way It only causes to an internet fight which will show up inside The House's Memes channel.
>
> you know; everybody has his own version of truth; It can be pretty hard to change others' truths.

I don't understand you Hamas is a nationalist and religious organization that controls Gaza and is a terrorist organization what is the problem? And it is true that everyone has the truth, but facts cannot be debated

Before a group grasp power over territory and international recognition , it is always seen differently as justified freedom fighers prefering to die fighting against external evil opression or mean terrorists/banditen fanatics:
Masada=Jim Jones Temple or Waco? ,
Warsow Getto or Warsow Uprising , Irgun, UCK of Albania,
mujahedins of afganistan while against CCCP =OK , while against USA = evil....
AZOW of Ukraine/Donbas separatists,
Founding Fathers of USA also were by London called badly....
Each side can chose and interpret selection of facts to their will .
Always were/are white and black legend of:Napoleon , Bolshevics, Hitler and perhaps everyone other -even Mother Theresa of Calcuta has a black legend -just your TV didnt tell you about it....

@Cezrun64 said in #24:
> Before a group grasp power over territory and international recognition , it is always seen differently as justified freedom fighers prefering to die fighting against external evil opression or mean terrorists/banditen fanatics:
> [...]

Can we agree that when the wacks are exercising executive power of a government, we got an issue to deal with? For example let's say the wack in in charge of National Security. Can at least other countries suggest to the boss of government it could be a nice thing to at least consider getting rid of the wack?

who decides of wack-ness ?
One in charge of National Security is not by accident , forces who placed him there may be rather remove nominal 'boss'of G. than change policy.And 'boss' knows that and thinks the same -otherwise he wouldnt be appointed -yes- not democratically elected(local TV version) but in fact appointed .
Did wacks of using A-bomb in H .+N. , or Dresden destruction were at least named and got rid? Stance : it is/was justiyfied -only enemies tell otherwise (or duped by them naive simpletons)
The same was , is and will be everywhere with everything .
Each state forces its own hagada onto others - showing weakness is mistake causing troubles.
While in power justified . After defeat -wacked crime. History teach us that .

@a4477 said in #23:
> I don't understand you Hamas is a nationalist and religious organization that controls Gaza and is a terrorist organization what is the problem? And it is true that everyone has the truth, but facts cannot be debated
Hamas is too small for an "organization".
about truth; well; you know how some people keep side of Hamas so... you get what I mean; right?

@Cezrun64 said in #26:
> who decides of wack-ness ?
> One in charge of National Security is not by accident , forces who placed him there may be rather remove nominal 'boss'of G. than change policy.And 'boss' knows that and thinks the same -otherwise he wouldnt be appointed -yes- not democratically elected(local TV version) but in fact appointed .
> [...]

Well IDF decided he have enough wackness to dispense him from military service.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itamar_Ben-Gvir

@bfchessguy said in #25:
> [...] For example let's say the wack is in charge of National Security. [..]

Well IDF decided....= far away in past , yes.
But he IS The Israeli Occupation Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben Gvir,

@RetiredProffesor said in #27:
> Hamas is too small for an "organization".
But they are a few thousand people, and they sometimes team up with other terrorist organizations such as hezbolla...either way their actions are considered terrorism, even if they may not be an organization.